Following the rebranding, disillusioned Twitter.com users sought solace in a recreated version of the platform with the old design and beloved blue bird logo. Dubbed Twitter Classic, this nostalgic alternative aimed to cater to those yearning for the simplicity and familiarity that Twitter.com had lost. Since its launch on July 24, 2023, Twitter Classic has garnered immense traction, with thousands of users flocking to the site.
Thesis on $TWC a Twitter Clone (Parody)👇— 0xp ◼️ (@0xpmila) July 25, 2023
1. First ever social media platform coin that actually works
2. Old Twitter will always be relevant and missed
3. Community members amplifying their own echo chamber on there creating a real cult
4. Advertisers onboarding paying holders? pic.twitter.com/oUSZECgJ5f
The Ban on Twitter Classic
However, the official X.com moderation team expressed strong opposition to Twitter Classic, implementing a ban on users who shared links to the resurrected platform. This heavy-handed response had a significant impact on the online community, stirring up debates and showcasing the power dynamics inherent in such situations.
Twitter Classic brings back the nostalgic Twitter vibes and $TWC, its native token, will be used for payments within the platform.— Page01🟣 (@Page0114) July 25, 2023
Only 2days old and sponsor ads already comes in play.@TClassic_co @Twclassicmemes @TWCbangers pic.twitter.com/aAjNLjbWsU
Reasons Behind the Ban
Several factors might contribute to the decision to ban links to Twitter Classic:
Protecting Intellectual Property: X.com likely wants to maintain control over the Twitter brand, safeguarding its intellectual property rights. The use of the old design and logo by Twitter Classic could be seen as an infringement on their rebranded identity.
Ensuring User Experience Consistency: By outlawing Twitter Classic, X.com seeks to maintain a consistent user experience across their platform. The rebranding efforts were undertaken to refresh and modernize the site, and alternative versions could undermine this objective.
Commercial and Financial Considerations: X.com may fear that Twitter Classic's popularity could divert users, resulting in decreased traffic and potentially affecting advertising revenues. By banning links to the classic version, they aim to protect their market share and maintain their dominance in the social media landscape.
Our previous account was locked by @elonmusk, so we won't be able to share all the information about the classic project here.— TClassic (parody) (@TClassic_co) July 25, 2023
Follow these links for more info! 💚
DEX: https://t.co/nAGlIgr0XA pic.twitter.com/IrsXQSqL1W
Amidst the ban, allegations of shadowbanning have arisen, suggesting that X.com actively suppresses the visibility and reach of individuals who share Twitter Classic links. Shadowbanning refers to covertly limiting a user's online visibility without their knowledge. While these claims may be speculative, they raise concerns about X.com's potential manipulation of content and its impact on freedom of expression.
Community Backlash and Implications
The ban on Twitter Classic, coupled with the alleged shadowbanning, has triggered a significant backlash within the online community. Users perceive the ban as an infringement on their freedom to choose the platform they prefer and a restriction on their ability to engage in discourse regarding the classic version. Additionally, the ban raises questions about the concentration of power in the hands of major social media platforms, highlighting the need for increased transparency and accountability in content moderation practices.
The ban on sharing links to Twitter Classic by X.com reflects their efforts to protect their rebranded platform and control their intellectual property. While the motivations behind the ban may seem reasonable from a business perspective, the shadowbanning allegations raise concerns about content manipulation and user autonomy. The repercussions of this ban expose the power dynamics between social media companies and their users, underscoring the importance of ongoing discussions surrounding content moderation and online freedoms.